I have spent the last months doing extensive research on Emma’s life. I have learned more about her family (especially her siblings); have found a letter in the Library of Congress from her to Carl Schurz, the Secretary of the Interior: see his reply to her); believe she befriended a famous Native American woman who was lecturing in San Francisco; have discovered she used several different names; found out she was fired from her job at the Women’s Pavilion and replaced by a Philadelphia woman; found out that she called herself a journalist until her incarceration in a mental hospital in California; learned she may have raised greyhound dogs; obtained her death certificate. I will be traveling to California next month to visit her grave site and see if there is any information about her at the mental hospital.
CONFIRMED: This is a response to a letter from Emma. I have seen her letter in Carl Schrz’s papers in the Library of Congress. The signature on it matches one she used to sign Aime Marchand’s citizenship papers.
UPDATE: There is a newspaper article about Sarah Winnemucca in a San Francisco newspaper, possibly by Emma?
I just ran across a reference to a letter from a “Miss Emma Allison” sent to the Secretary of the Interior, Carl Schurz, in 1880. Schurz is thanking this Emma Allison for bring some information about Native Americans to his attention. Did Emma, in her capacity as a writer for the Daily Graphic in New York (still speculative) or in her work as a copyist in the office of the U.S. Surveyor-General in San Francisco (also speculative, but very likely) lead her to write this letter? The letter itself is not yet available but may be among Schurz’s papers which I will search next. More intrigue…here is Schurz’s response to her:
The Chief Winnemucca mentioned here was a famous leader of the Norther Paiute. The Malheur reservation was established for the Paiutes but was abandoned during their battles with the U.S. government and was then returned to non-Indian control.
The next letter that is available in Schurz’s record of correspondences as Secretary of the Interior (see volume 3, page 501) is one to the famous author Helen Hunt Jackson who would write Ramona in 1884, a sympathetic novel about Native Americans. The letter to Jackson is also about Native Americans. Was there some connection between the women?
The search goes on…
UPDATE: Emma claims to have lived in the United States before the Centennial, and to have come into the country in 1872 on a later census form. Still no evidence that this was the case.
Today I found proof that the Emma Allison who married A.D. Marchand in 1887 in California is the same Emma Allison who worked at the Centennial Exhibition. This proof opens up a lot more questions but also confirms the part of the story that Emma (and her mother and maybe some siblings) moved to California. Presumably this would be in 1877 after her father dies that year.
After a great talk at the 2013 Steampunk World’s Fair about Emma Allison and her fate, I thought more about the man she may have married later in life, A.D. Marchand. Someone in the audience had asked what I knew about him and to this point very little. But I have learned that if you keep doing the same search online, you can get different results because so much new info is posted constantly. So thank you to the person that asked that question because here is the new info that it helped uncover.
Keep in mind that a lot of this is still speculation because I cannot yet prove that the Emma Allison that married A.D. Marchand is the same as our Emma. But even if this is just another story of another Emma, it is revealing about the things women faced in that time period.
So I looked up Emma Allison’s marriage to a man name Marchand and a first name appeared: Aime. Aime Marchand, it turns out, was the brother of of Desire Marchand, a trained assayer of metals, including gold. Harris, Marchand, & Co. was an assay office in Sacramento established in 1855 as the gold rush was turning from an individual enterprise into big business, with large companies doing the gold extraction. Aime Marchand, born around 1836, was an assayer of gold in his brother’s firm. The Marchands’ father was rumored to be a friend of John Sutter of Sutter’s Mill where gold was first discovered. Here is an 1855 ad for the Marchand firm in Sacramento; they had another office in Marysville (from an article in the Western Express journal).
I know it is almost fantastical that Emma Allison was also involved through marriage in the California Gold Rush, but it gets better. The reason so much is now know and available about the Marchand assay office is because in 1986 a shipwreck was located off the coast of Virginia that was confirmed to be the long lost S.S. Central America. The Central America was lost in a storm in 1857. It was carrying gold coins and ingots, including some that had the assay marks of the Harris/Marchand company. This gold was recovered and eventually offered for sale in the 1990s and it is the auction houses that uncovered the wealth of information about the Marchand brothers. Here is what a gold ingot with the Marchand mark looks like. It sold for $891,250 in 2012.
UPDATE: The man who recovered the gold from the wreck of the S.S. Central America, Tommy Thompson, has been arrested in Florida (January 2015) for deceiving investors who funded his recovery activities.
Desire Marchand sold his part of the assay business in 1859. By 1860, according to one auction house, Aime Marchand was doing assay work in Victoria, British Columbia. The same journal cited above states that Aime’s work in British Columbia was cut short because he was accused of embezzling funds.
He disappears from the area and reappears in San Francisco in 1862. Correction: he is arrested and convicted in Canada.
The story gets wilder as Marchand is on the run and “hard up” for money:
That certainly makes him an interesting and shady character. Remember that Emma at this point is about 17 years old. He was captured in April, 1862 and sent to trial. I will try to find the results.
UPDATE 2: Was there another Emma Allison in San Francisco at the same time, one who used the middle initial “B”? There is a record of an Emma B gaining citizenship who was a copyist. Still uncertain.
UPDATE 1: Very likely yes since Emma mentions to one person in 1876 that she previously worked as a copyist.
Did Emma Allison go to San Francisco to be a writer as she supposedly told one author? Here is a reference to an Emma Allison in San Francisco in 1882, working as a clerk at the U.S Surveyor-General’s Office. The title page of this directory and page 69 can be viewed in this PDF. This full document can be viewed and downloaded at Internet archive. Is this our Emma Allison?
Langley’s San Francisco Directory, 1882, p. 69
Emma’s mother dies in San Jose, California in 1887. Does this mean the family moved there after the death of Emma’s father, Richard, in 1877? UPDATE: Emma lists 1877 as the date of her entry into the United States on later census forms.
There is an Emma Allison who marries an A.D. Marchand in 1887. One possible connection between Marchand and the Emma Allison listed in the U.S. Surveyor-General’s office is that Marchand was a supervisor for a mining company. UPDATE: This is the same Emma Allison.
See new information uncovered about Marchand in this post: Who was A.D. Marchand: A Treasure of Gold
The Woman’s Journal (a newspaper associated with abolitionist and suffragist Lucy Stone) reported that Emma Allison was found starving in her boarding room two months after the Centennial Exhibition opened. This report was later disputed by the Women’s Pavilion newspaper. UPDATE: Lucy Stone also later disputes the story, pointing out that it was very likely the food the sickened her. Later reports also suggest that many workers at the exhibition became ill with Yellow Fever and other diseases.
No record of Susan B. Anthony or Matilda Gage discussing this incident have been found in their letters, diaries, or other accounts (so far). A PDF of the full page of the newspaper is here.
“Women vs. Whisky in Philadelphia,” The Woman’s Journal, July 1, 1876, p. 1
How did Emma Allison get hired to run the steam engine in the Women’s Pavilion? The only mention of the process suggests that a Mrs. Wright (
probably Martha Coffin Wright, Lucretia Mott’s sister correction: it was Henrietta Hoskins Price Wright, wife of Robert Kemp Wright) suggested hiring a female steam engineer. How Emma was chosen is still unknown.
An Emma Allison, age 22, from Grimsby, was listed as an inmate at the Toronto Insane Asylum. Is this the same Emma Allison? UPDATE: This is the same Emma Allison.
Is this also the same Emma Allison? UPDATE: This is the same Emma Allison. She lists her profession for years as a journalist, one time stating that it was for the Daily Graphic. This balloon adventure was reported by dozens of newspapers across the country and Emma later tells her account of the story to a reporter in California.
In 1879, off the coast of California, a young woman named Emma Allison was caught in scandal as she traveled as a reporter in a hot air balloon. Full story below, but here is an image I found that is possibly the first and only one we have of Emma (if this is our Emma Allison).
Here is the report from the National Police Gazette, page 5 of this July 19, 1879 issue. NationalPoliceGazette1879-p4-5 can be seen here.
A Los Angeles Times version of the story was printed on July 8, 1879.LAT-July1879balloon
Posted here are the accounts of Emma Allison in newspapers and books from 1876 and afterwards that report her activities in the 1876 Women’s Building at the Centennial Exhibition in Philadelphia. Click on the articles to view them or click on the links to view the article in its larger context.
•”What One Woman Is Doing,” The New Century for Woman, June 3, 1876, p. 26
This article marks the first mention of Emma Allison in The New Century for Woman newspaper which was printed in the Women’s Pavilion. It appears to be a reprint from the Philadelphia Press and references an earlier article from the Philadelphia Press (or sometimes it is named the Philadelphia Times; that may be the article below). The first two pages of the June 3, 1876 issue are attached here.
•”A Woman in an Engineer’s Role,” The Philadelphia Times, June 2, 1876
The information about Emma Allison that is most often quoted or reprinted is from this article in the morning edition of The Times (Philadelphia). The text is the same as that in the reprint below except for the title. Attached here is the entire page from the newspaper.
•”A Woman Machinist,” The Englishwoman’s Review of Social and Industrial Questions, November, 1876. pp. 525-526.
The article from the Philadelphia Times was reprinted in a British feminist newspaper in November of 1876. A PDF of the pages is attached here. The full year’s issue can be downloaded at Internet Archive.
A Woman Machinist
The Philadelphia Times says: The women of the United States resolved to display at the Exhibition a complete representation of their industries, art, and skill. They have accomplished their purpose, and, in so doing, were careful to exclude as far as possible everything emanating from the hand or brain of the opposite sex. Though they did not actually build the Women’s Pavilion, they paid for its erection, and their exhibits in that structure, with the exception of the machinery, are the work of their own hands. The same is to be said of their guests and co- exhibitors, the women of England, Canada, and other countries. The rule has been carried even to the engine-house, where the Baxter portable engine of six-horse power is run by a woman engineer. This engine is the motor of all the spinning frames, looms, and other machinery in practical operation within the pavilion, and its fair mistress is Miss Emma Allison, of Grimsby, Ontario. She is by no means a soot-begrimed and oil-covered Amazon, but on the contrary, of neat and cleanly appearance and a highly educated and refined young lady. Of the brunette type, medium height, well-formed, strong and active, possessing a gentle disposition and much vivacity and good sense in conversation, she affords no little attraction to visitors as she dexterously manages her iron pet and tells them all about it. Her dress is neat, and of grayish linen, prettily braided in black. She makes it a point to keep both engine and room in the perfection of tidiness, and while she would grace a parlour in a manner equal to that of any lady, no lady in ballroom attire could grace that engine room better than she. Her choice of this employment comes, she says, from three sources, namely: Her delight in the study of natural philosophy gave her a fondness for machinery which was developed into its comprehension through the assistance of her brother, a member of the Engineer Corps of the United States navy; her means being limited, she must follow some remunerative occupation, and she accepted her present position as the one of her choice, although hitherto she had nothing but theoretical knowledge of steam engineering, and she believed it the duty of some one of her sex to enter a “new departure” which is among those opening out to women employment far more paying and healthful, requiring as much knowledge and skill for its accomplishment, and carrying with it as great honour as teaching school, keeping books, or operating sewing machines, copying, etc. She believes that if so many male engineers did not find such apparent delight in plastering themselves all over with soot and making their engine rooms perfect specimens of disorder and filth women would long ago have looked with favour upon the occupation. She does not, however, intend continuing in the work after the Exhibition, purposing then to start a literary magazine in San Francisco.
•“A Lady Engineer,” The New-York Evangelist, June 22, 1876, p. 7
This coverage of Emma Allison may be a reprint from another newspaper but it gives the most complete account of her background. See the full page here.
•”Two Remarkable Women,” Iowa State Reporter, Waterloo, Iowa, June 21, 1876, p. 7.
This is a reprint of an article first printed in the The New Century for Woman. A PDF version of the Iowa newspaper page is attached here. A similar story was reprinted in a Hillsborough, Ohio newspaper.
•”The Great Exhibition: What Women Have Done for It,” New York Times, June 4, 1876, p. 1
The New York Times wrote an unfavorable view of the Women’s Pavilion and mentioned the woman engineer. The page can be viewed in this PDF.
•”The Centennial Exposition: The Woman’s Pavilion,” Scientific American, June 24, 1876, p. 401
The Scientific American covered the Centennial extensively and was very interested in the inventions and new technologies shown there. Some of their supplements provided extensive, non-crtical review of the contents of the Women’s Pavilion. But this review is not kind to the “Woman’s Pavilion” and its contents, except for Emma Allison. The full page is available here.
•”The Centennial Exhibition: The Woman’s Pavilion,” Manufacturer and Builder, July 1876, p. 148
This monthly magazine describes all the exhibits in detail but only gives this brief description of the Women’s Pavilion. The entire page can be seen here.
Next in importance to this edifice [the United States Government Building] is the Woman’s Pavilion, a modest structure, extending over nearly an acre of ground, and devoted to the display of nearly every kind of women’s handiwork. The Queen of England sends a napkin woven by herself, and the Princesses some beautiful silk embroideries, also the result of their own labor. Even the engine which drives the looms is managed by a lady—she is a regularly educated engineer, and seemingly is perfectly familiar with machinery. Many an engineer of the opposite sex might learn a profitable lesson both from the perfect neatness of the mechanism and its fair attendant. The fact proves, if nothing else, that prevalence of grease and dirt, such as one commonly finds in most engine-rooms,is not at all necessary to the successful management of machinery.
•”At the Centennial Exhibition: Baxter Engine,” Saturday Evening Post, July 8, 1876, p.4
This is a general review of the Centennial Exhibition with mention of the Women’s Pavilion’s engineer. A PDF of the full page is here.
•The Illustrated History of the Centennial Exhibition, etc., James McCabe, 1876, p. 591.
This extensively illustrated record of the Centennial Exhibition and the city of Philadelphia. It mentions Emma Allison and her work in the Women’s Pavilion. It mistakenly says she is from Iowa (most other accounts say she is from Ontario, which is in Canada; this Iowa mistake continues to show up in accounts of Emma to this day). The beginning of Chapter XVIII, which describes the Women’s Building, called here “The Woman’s Building,” is available as a PDF here. A full copy of the McCabe book is available at Internet Archive.
•Eastward Ho! Or, Leaves from the Diary of a Centennial Pilgrim, David Bailey, 1877, p. 80.
An account of the author’s visit to the Centennial. Published after the exhibitions closed, the author draws on newspaper accounts as well as personal experience. It is not known if he actually saw Emma Allison. The title pages and the chapter this mention appears in are in this PDF.
•Daughters of America OR Woman of the Century, Phoebe Hanaford, 1883, p. 626
This is a survey of women’s lives and occupations in the 19th century. Chapter XX looks at women inventors and mentions Emma Allison. The chapter is available as a PDF here.
•A Book of Remembrance (1901) by Elizabeth Duane Gillespie, p 319-320
Gillespie was the head of the Women’s Committee at the Centennial Exhibition. Emma Allison is described (but not named) on pages 319-320 of her book. Gillespie is quoting from newspapers accounts from 1876 and not necessarily recounting her own memories. Her description of the engineer as gaining her skills in a factory is not consistent with other reports. The book is available free online at Internet Archive.
In October our building was begun. Although there was no corner-stone laid our Committees met on the spot to see the first spadeful of earth taken out. We gave thanks that we were granted this privilege, hopeful that through our work other women would be benefited. Having space enough, we decided to have looms in one corner for ribbons and silks, and women weavers in charge of them. This required the addition of a steam-engine, and we built a little house for it outside, and engaged a woman engineer. The fertile brain of a woman writer, Mrs. S. C. F. Hallowell, suggested the propriety of having a newspaper edited and printed within our walls. This plan was adopted, and most successful it proved. It was published weekly; its name was The New Century for Women [sic: Woman]. It was from beginning to end a sheet that could be read by any young person without detriment. It is true it contained no account of a prize-fight, no ghastly tale of the turning on of gas for the destruction of any mortal life or lives, and no impossible picture of the “last Paris hint” in the shape of a tall hat with taller feathers, or worse still, with bunches of flowers supported by wires, only too evident to the beholder, and consequently not ornamental. There were then in our daily press no pictures of ” costumes de promenade” as there are now, when the sight of the contracted waist makes one’s breath come thick and short, and we are lost in wonder as to the sensations of the wearer whose picture in the public press looks like a note of interrogation. Our paper, written, edited, and printed by women, contained only what was calculated to instruct and amuse the reader. Mrs. S. C. F. Hallowell and her able assistant, Miss Stockton, carried this branch of the work to a successful issue and to the delight and satisfaction of all interested. The same engine which moved the machinery for the looms moved also the printing-press for The New Century. A newspaper commenting during the Exhibition upon this “new industry for women” said, “You should have seen the engineer sitting in the little engine-room answering the questions of the bystanders. She said her labor was not as exhausting as taking care of an ordinary cook-stove, that it required about one hour’s actual work per day. She had just picked up the necessary knowledge with regard to the construction of her charge while working in a factory. ‘But do you do all the work?’ asked a visitor. ‘Everything, from lighting the fire in the morning to blowing off steam at night,’ was the quick reply, and she was then receiving a larger salary than a teacher in one of our country schools.”
•”Toward a New Century: Women and the Philadelphia Centennial Exhibition, 1876″ by Mary Frances Cordato.
In The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography, Vol. 107, No. 1 (Jan., 1983), pp. 113-135. Published by The Historical Society of Pennsylvania.
This is an excellent overview of the Women’s Pavilion at the Centennial. Cordato explains the importance of Emma Allison on pages 123-124. Link to JSTOR (requires access or subscription) or free at the magazine above.
Promoters of the Woman’s Building expressed a special interest in placing women into the mainstream of nineteenth-century American progress. They were aware that the modern economic system had created new, highly paid positions which both sexes could perform with equal success. To illustrate this point, organizers employed a lady engineer, Emma Allison of Grimsly, Ontario, whose small six horse power engine generated enough energy to run a printing press, spinning frames, and power looms. Allison, who managed her engine entirely herself “from starting the fire in the morning, to blowing off steam at night,” found her work enjoyable, relaxing, and profitable. When asked whether females could run such machines on a regular basis, Allison “expressed her confidence” in their ability, stating “that there were thousands of small engines in various parts of the country, and no reason existed why women should not be employed to manage them.” Tending an engine required “far less attention” and was less fatiguing than minding a small child or taking charge of an ordinary stove.
Female organizers never intended to desex women. Instead, they hoped to mix feminine virtue with professional achievement. Allison was most admired for the domestic attributes she brought to the otherwise male trade of engineering. “She is no low, vulgar woman,” wrote one spectator, “but an educated and accomplished lady.” She does her work “in such a neat, womanly way,” insisted another admirer, “as to make one recall with disgust many other engine-rooms, where the inevitable masculine heat, dust, and smoke are increased a thousand-fold by disorder.” Allison symbolized, for promoters of the Woman’s Building, the promise of significant change. She represented an acceptance of the American woman into a growing economic system, while she remained faithful to the female attributes of respectability, cleanliness, and order. Allison demonstrated that women were fully capable of taking command of the nation’s industrial activity and progress, without sacrificing woman’s virtue.